Johnson & Potter’s (n.d.) case study “Walking the Tightrope” demonstrates how different ethical obligations like patient autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence often conflict during delivery of care. Pain management is especially difficult, given the problematic side effects and potential for abuse of some pain management interventions. The patient in the case in question has been described as a “complainer,” but there is no indication of dementia (Johnson & Potter, n.d.). Therefore, there should be no reason to allow the family members to continue in their overbearing manner preventing the patient from making her own decisions regarding pain relief. The case illustrates the doctor, the sister, and the brother making decisions on the patient’s behalf, clearly impinging on her autonomy. The disparate voices are also pulling in opposite directions, leading to a piecemeal and haphazard approach to pain management that could cause further complications and even medication errors. This would also open the healthcare institution for possible malpractice suits, given the level of experimentation being done with interventions like Nalfron causing the patient distress. It would be most helpful in this case to create a healthcare team that can make evidence-based decisions, albeit with some input from...

In this case, the nurse has a moral responsibility to serve in an advocacy role, mediating between the needs of the patient for pain relief, and the equally important needs for providing relief that does not interfere with her health prognosis. The nurse might learn that from the patient’s perspective, being “doped up” is a far better alternative to being in constant pain or experiencing adverse reactions to other types of pain management interventions. There is also a moral obligation to offer the patient additional non-pharmacological interventions ranging from mindfulness meditation to supervised long walks outdoors.
Healthcare workers in this case are in a difficult position because they will be expected to ascribe to different ethical frameworks and professional obligations at the same time. As Maumus (2015) points out, too, “the physician is in the precarious position of needing to make decisions in the best interest of the patient while receiving pressure from system administrators to reduce lengths of stay or clinic visit time,” (p. 124). If the patient had been abusing prescription opioids, then the healthcare workers do need to find a feasible solution to pain management that precludes narcotics. As Smebye, Kirkevold & Engedal (2016) also point…